Pilot implementation of a delirium prevention system of care

Completed

You are on the Health Professional view
  • Source

    -
    Public Title Pilot implementation of a delirium prevention system of care
    Scientific Title Pilot to test implementation feasibility and acceptability of a delirium prevention system of care
    Acronym N/A
    Primary Trial Identifying Number ISRCTN65924234
    Secondary Identifying Number 10652
    Source of Record Data provided by the ISRCTN Register http://isrctn.org
    Source of Record URL http://isrctn.org/ISRCTN65924234
    Date of Registration 2012-06-29
    Date Last Updated 2012-06-29
    Date Record Refreshed on UKCTG 2013-04-16
  • Trial

    -
    Research Question Delirium, or acute confusional illness, is common in older people: as many as a third of hospitalised older people can develop delirium and many people do not fully recover. However, although there is much that could be done to prevent delirium, the NHS does not have routine care systems capable of minimising the impact of this condition. In an ongoing study, we are developing a delirium prevention system of care for use in NHS hospital wards. We now want to test this delirium prevention system of care in hospital wards to see how well it works and how acceptable it is to patients, carers, volunteers and staff. To do this, in cooperation with managers, staff and hospital volunteers, we will introduce the delirium prevention system of care on at least one ward in each of three hospitals over six months and implement it for a further six months. We will undertake an audit before and after implementation of the delirium prevention system of care to see what impact it had on staff workload. We will assess the impact of the delirium prevention system of care on patients’ satisfaction with care using questions from the national inpatient questionnaire survey. We will interview patients, carers, staff and hospital volunteers to see how acceptable the delirium prevention system of care has been. We will collect data to assess how well the delirium prevention system of care has been used in practice. We will analyse all the data to see how feasible and acceptable the delirium prevention system of care has been and whether we need to alter it. If we find it has been successful, we plan to test the delirium prevention system of care in a future study to see if it reduces delirium. (from UKCRN Portfolio)
    Additional lay summaries...
    Lay summary under review 1 (from ISRCTN)
    Ethics Approval Bradford Research Ethics Committee, 25 October 2010, ref: 10/H1302/66
    Study Design Pilot observational qualitative trial
    Design Type Sorry, not currently available
    Design Details Sorry, not currently available
    Health Condition(s) or Problem Generic Health Relevance: Age and ageing
    Participants Inclusion Criteria Hospital staff and volunteers: 1. Introductory workshop and associated followup interviews Workshop participants will include patient and carer representatives, hospital managers, clinical and voluntary service managers, volunteers, senior clinicians, nurses and therapists. We will arrange individual followup interviews with purposefully selected staff. 2. Delirium Prevention System of Care Implementation Teams Team members will consist of staff having a potential interest/role in the delirium prevention system of care, e.g. senior manager, senior doctor, matron, nurse consultant and/or specialist nurse, staff nurse, therapist, manager of the volunteer service, volunteer, patient representative, care assistant and ward clerk or housekeeper. 3. Audit of the impact of the intervention on staff workload All members of the participating ward team and volunteers involved in the delirium prevention intervention present on the participating wards during the audit which will occur over six shifts on each participating ward. 4. Acceptability to staff and volunteers Interviews and focus groups with a sample of service managers, staff and volunteers from participating wards. Patients and carers: 1. Patient satisfaction questionnaire Consecutive patients about to be discharged from the participating wards at the start of the implementation phase and during the delivery phase of the intervention. 2. Patient description All patients admitted to the participating wards over the six months of the delivery of the delirium prevention system of care intervention. 3. Audit of the impact of the intervention on staff workload Patients present on the ward at the time of the audit which will occur over six shifts on each participating ward. 4. Acceptability to patients and carers Interviews with a purposeful sample of patients discharged from participating wards and their carers with differing, positive and negative perceptions of care experiences identified through the satisfaction questionnaire 5. Male and femal participants 6. Aged 65 years and over
    Participants Exclusion Criteria 1. Patients in a terminal phase of their illness 2. Does not meet inclusion criteria
    Participant Sex Sorry, not currently available
    Participant Age Range Sorry, not currently available
    Participant Type Sorry, not currently available
    Target Sample Size Planned Sample Size: 500; UK Sample Size: 500
    Date of First Enrolment Sorry, not currently available
    Date of Recruitment End Sorry, not currently available
    Date of End of Follow-up Sorry, not currently available
    Trial End Date Sorry, not currently available
    Recruitment Status Completed
    Overall Trial Status Sorry, not currently available
    Countries of Recruitment United Kingdom
    Nation England
    Location Bradford
    Interventions The intervention is a delirium prevention system of care ? the Prevention of Delirium (POD) Programme. The POD Programme is a ward-based, quality improvement programme which will be embedded in usual ward practice. The POD Programme will consist of a multicomponent intervention targeting ten modifiable delirium risk factors in older people in hospital: cognitive impairment / disorientation, dehydration and/or constipation, hypoxia, infection, limited mobility or immobility, pain, polypharmacy.
    Primary Outcome Measures We will undertake a before and after study in each of the case study sites.
    Secondary Outcome Measures No secondary outcome measures
    Website Sorry, not currently available
  • Results

    -
    Results Reporting Sorry, not currently available
    Publications Sorry, not currently available
  • Contact

    -
    Contact for Public Queries Prof John Young The Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation Bradford Royal Infirmary Duckworth Lane West Yorkshire Bradford BD9 6RJ United Kingdom +44 (0)1274 542200 john.young@bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk
    Contact for Scientific Queries Sorry, not currently available
  • Sponsor

    -
    Study sponsored by Bradford Institute for Health Research (UK) Research Support and Governance Office Temple Bank House Bradford Royal Infirmary Duckworth Lane Bradford BD9 6RJ United Kingdom +44 (0)1274 383080 +44 (0)1274 382640 bradfordresearch@bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk http://www.bradfordresearch.nhs.uk/
    Study also sponsored by Sorry, not currently available
    Primary Sponsor Type Sorry, not currently available
    Secondary Sponsor Type Sorry, not currently available
  • Funder

    -
    Study funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK)
    Funder Type Sorry, not currently available
Please note:
  1. The UKCTG information is designed to inform you of existing trials. If you wish to join a specific trial, you must discuss this with your own doctor who may decide to get in touch with the contact listed.
  2. The UKCTG is not responsible for the quality of the data displayed in the Gateway but can contact the data providers. Please contact us if you have any query regarding the quality of trial records.