Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Evaluation Study

Recruiting

You are on the General Public view
  • Source

    -
    Public Title Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Evaluation Study
    Acronym NICE
    Source of Record URL http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00905359
  • Trial

    -
    Health Condition(s) or Problem Spinal Stenosis
    Lay Summary The objective of the NICE study is to provide clinical evidence proving that the Aperius™ PercLID™ System is safe and non-inferior to standalone decompressive surgery with regards to clinical outcomes in patients suffering from Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication, relieved by flexion. (from ClinicalTrials.gov)
    Who can enter the trial Inclusion Criteria: - Presence of symptomatic DLSS - Presence of NIC - Patient would be candidate for Standalone Decompressive Surgery - Patient has signed Informed Consent form (ICF) - Patient is 21 years old or older Exclusion Criteria: - Previous lumbar surgery - Patient is candidate for instrumented Decompressive Surgery - Patient has back pain without leg pain - Degenerative Spondylolisthesis greater than grade 1 (Meyerding) - Symptomatic DLSS at more than 2 levels in the lumbar region - Spinal stenosis is present at L5-S1 level
    Who cannot enter the trial Inclusion Criteria: - Presence of symptomatic DLSS - Presence of NIC - Patient would be candidate for Standalone Decompressive Surgery - Patient has signed Informed Consent form (ICF) - Patient is 21 years old or older Exclusion Criteria: - Previous lumbar surgery - Patient is candidate for instrumented Decompressive Surgery - Patient has back pain without leg pain - Degenerative Spondylolisthesis greater than grade 1 (Meyerding) - Symptomatic DLSS at more than 2 levels in the lumbar region - Spinal stenosis is present at L5-S1 level
    What will happen Procedure; Aperius™ PercLID™ System and Standalone Decompressive Surgery; Aperius™ PercLID™ System: implantation with the Interspinous Process Device Aperius. Standalone Decompressive Surgery: lumbar decompressive surgery without instrumentation or fusion; Aperius™ PercLID™ System; Standalone Decompressive Surgery
    Primary aim Mean percentage change from baseline in Physical Function at 1 year follow-up using the patient completed Zurich Claudication Questionnaire
    Secondary Aim Mean percentage change from baseline in Physical Function, using the patient completed Zurich Claudication Questionnaire; 14d, 6w, 6, 24, 36, 48m; No; Outcomes of the Symptom Severity and Patient Satisfaction domains of the patient completed Zurich Claudication Questionnaire; 14d, 6w, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48m; No; Mean percentage change from baseline in Leg Pain VAS Scores; 14d, 6w, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48m; No; QoL related outcomes using the patient completed SF-36 v2 questionnaire; 14d, 6w, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48m; No; Assessment of the radiological changes in the stenotic region.; 12, 24, 48 months; No; Percentage of patients requiring surgical intervention at index level; Full follow up period; Yes; Proportion of subjects with complications at the secondary surgical intervention; Full follow up period; Yes; Proportion of subjects with Serious Adverse Device Effects; Full follow up period; Yes; Determining if there is a correlation between sagittal balance or other radiological findings and the clinical outcomes; 12, 24, 48 months; No; Proportion of subjects with improvement of symptoms, symptoms recurrence, decreased therapeutic response, no therapeutic response and treatment failure; 14d, 6w, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48m; Yes
    Participant Information Sheet Sorry, not currently available
    Website Sorry, not currently available
    Recruitment Status Recruiting
    Nation Scotland
    Location Aberdeen
  • Contact

    -
    Contact for Public Queries C. Beelen, Study Manager nice.studyregistration@medtronic.com
    Contact for Scientific Queries Sorry, not currently available
Please note:
  1. The UKCTG information is designed to inform you of existing trials. If you wish to join a specific trial, you must discuss this with your own doctor who may decide to get in touch with the contact listed.
  2. The UKCTG is not responsible for the quality of the data displayed in the Gateway but can contact the data providers. Please contact us if you have any query regarding the quality of trial records.